Career and technical education (CTE) teacher versus a coach

[read_meter]

When looking at a teacher versus a coach in career and technical education it really depends on the abilities and needs of the students. It generally comes down to their level of proficiency and their current phase of career development.

CTE teachers are often the ideal choice when students are acquiring knowledge and practical experience related to a career. This is commonly during the early stages and courses of a student’s journey in CTE.

This is different then for a CTE coach. Students who are training their tech skills in real scenarios are best suited for a coach. This usually happens in the later stages of their development. Lets take a look at both of these critical types of guides for students.

Common Misconceptions About Teachers versus coaches in career and technical education

The idea of incorporating traditional coaching roles alongside teaching in Career and Technical Education (CTE) is a relatively new concept. This shift has given rise to several misconceptions. Let’s explore some of the most common ones:

1. Misconception: Teachers and coaches perform the same role
   • Reality: Teachers focus on delivering structured knowledge and guiding students through a curriculum, while coaches provide practical, hands-on feedback and guidance to help students apply skills in real-world scenarios.
2. Misconception: CTE coaches are only for developing teachers not students
   • Reality: CTE programs would more greatly benefit by using coaches during training for students, not just mentoring teachers.
3. Misconception: Coaching is only for sports, not technical education
   • Reality: Coaching is just as valuable in CTE, as it emphasizes situational learning and skill development, much like athletic coaching prepares athletes for competitive performance.

Understanding and addressing these misconceptions can help schools better integrate both teaching and coaching roles into their CTE programs for maximum student success.

Many believe career development can be done in one class.

Developing technical skills to a level of proficiency requires time and dedication. However, there is a common misconception that an introductory course, completed in less than a year, is sufficient to make someone work-ready. As a result, many schools assume that having teachers deliver this instruction is enough.

In reality, the skill development process spans years of training and practice to achieve true proficiency. During these advanced phases, coaches—rather than teachers—are often best equipped to guide learners, providing hands-on feedback and mentorship tailored to their growth and real-world application.

Many CTE frameworks do not include development phases in their model

Most career and technical development phases are too one-dimensional. They only focus on the career categories and pathways, as well as the skills required for development within them.

As a result, they do not have skill development phases defined within their framework models that would show the right type of teacher or coach for that phase. It is hard to know when to best utilize teachers or coaches without this. With this established, it will often show how important a coach is within the overall process.

In education, educators view CTE coaches as coaches of teachers, not students.

In the world of academia, a CTE coach is often considered as a career and technical education coach of teachers. While this role is important, this is not the definition we are using for a CTE coach. We believe that a CTE coach is a trainer that helps guide and develop students during the transition phase as the transition from students to workers.

People often view coaches as only able to train athletes versus in technical career professions.

The biggest misconception is that the best use of coaching skill is in athletics. While coaching in athletics is super valuable, the talent development process is very similar in modern careers and jobs. Much of a coach’s skill can also apply in the world of CTE as a result.

People undervalue athletic coaches for their skill in using training based instructional methods.

Whether coaching an athlete or a future technology worker, many of the instructional methods are exactly the same. Athletic coaches, especially in sports like soccer, undergo rigorous training and certification in hands-on coaching and talent development, which often even surpasses the level of training typically seen in teachers.

At the same time, the average salary for a soccer coach in California, for example is still dramatically less then the average CTE teacher. In California, the average salary for a CTE teacher is $104,600. Conversely, the average salary for an experienced soccer coach is around $72,800.

Many coaches only work part time and do much of this work at night and on weekends.

Common features of a CTE coach versus a teacher

A CTE coach versus a teacher has the following characteristics in developing technical and career talent.

Phase of development in which they participate

A CTE coach generally participates during the training phases of technical talent development. This is when students are starting to do hands-on activities to build skill proficiency.

Coaching environment versus teaching environment

Since coaches work more with developing talent while they are performing tasks, they generally work more in real technical environments and centers than teachers.

Instructional methods of a coach versus a teacher

The instructional methods of a coach versus a teacher includes watching and providing in the moment feedback and recommendations about technique. They also commonly use development planning activities with individuals to help them improve their skills. Further, they also provide emotional support during the development process.

Characteristics of a CTE teacher versus a coach

A CTE teacher demonstrates the following characteristics when developing technical and career talents.

Development phase participation

Career and technical education teachers generally participate during the experiential and learning portions of the career development process.

Teaching environment versus coaching environment

Since most of what teachers impart on students is knowledge, they often teach within classrooms. This often varies from realistic work environments as students practice their skills.

Instructional methods for a teacher versus a coach

There are many instructional methods that teachers use, however the most common are direct instruction and collaborative learning. Other common methods are items such as flipped classrooms.

Key differences between a CTE teacher versus a coach

Teachers are more familiar with academic practices and standards

The world of academia has many attributes that can seem foreign to those that are not within the discipline. So credentialed teachers are often more versed in these items, such as standards alignment then a coach may be. Especially if this coach is coming from the world of athletics.

Coaches will be more familiar with instructional methods during the training and development phases of CTE.

An experienced coach will be more familiar with active feedback and training activities that are common in technical career development then a teacher will be. This will often even be the case if both the teacher and coach have limited experience in what discipline they are instructing.

A coach versus a teacher are available to participate in CTE talent development

Since most athletic coaches work part time, especially at the youth level, as well as after school hours, they are often more available then existing teachers or even professionals in a discipline. This is because both teachers and professionals work during normal business hours.

The overall tech development process requires CTE coaches for longer

As mentioned earlier, the instructional and knowledge based portions are generally only in the first year of technical development process. The next 2 years and up will require more coaching skill set for developing talent.

Is a CTE teacher or coach right for my career and technical education program?

The answer is likely a combination of both teachers and coaches. As your school develops more CTE pathways, you’ll need skilled teachers during the knowledge-based phases of student development and experienced coaches during the training and transition phases.

For the knowledge-based phases, you’ll require teachers capable of delivering foundational and introductory CTE curriculum. These educators should have a basic proficiency in the career clusters they are teaching to effectively guide students through early learning stages.

For the training and transition phases, coaches are essential. They provide realistic, hands-on activities, timely feedback, and practical guidance that help students refine and master their technical skills. Coaches should be expert trainers with practical experience and high proficiency in their respective fields.

Your options include:

1. Training Existing Teachers: Develop your current CTE teachers to teach introductory courses and further train them as coaches for advanced development phases.
2. Hiring New Talent: Recruit skilled individuals to fill the roles of CTE teachers and coaches, ensuring they align with your program’s needs.
3. Transitioning Athletic Coaches: Adapt athletic coaches into CTE teachers and technical trainers. This innovative approach is something we’re actively supporting at CyberForward Academy to help schools and districts succeed.

By combining these strategies, you can build a robust team to support every phase of student development in your CTE program.

Next steps

If you are a school administrator, you might want to examine your CTE development framework to determine how you can use coaches versus teachers in your program. Also please reach out to us if you would like to talk about any of these concepts or further exploring developing technicians like athletes.

If you are an athletic coach looking to become a career and technical education teacher please explore our coaches pathway.